Does waterfall aerosol influence mucosal immunity and chronic stress? A randomized controlled clinical trial

Table 2 Means of evaluated physiological data (±SD)

		PEF (L/sec)	HR (%)	SC (%)	RSP (%)
WF+	Day 0	8.7 ± 2.0	98.7 ± 5.5	88.4 ± 12.8	91.2 ± 17.3
WF+	Day 6	9.0 ± 1.9	94.7 ± 9.2	81.5 ± 13.7	83.7 ± 16.2
WF−	Day 0	8.5 ± 1.5	97.7 ± 6.0	86.8 ± 12.4	91.1 ± 12.3
WF−	Day 6	8.9 ± 1.7	92.0 ± 6.9	87.3 ± 14.3	82.7 ± 13.0
CO	Day 0	8.6 ± 2.1	100.6 ± 7.0	90.8 ± 8.2	96.1 ± 17.3
CO	Day 6	8.6 ± 1.8	101.4 ± 7.3	90.4 ± 13.6	97.4 ± 19.6

Physiological data of the intervention groups (WF+ and WF−) and the control group on day 0 and day 6. Raw data of the peak expiratory flow (PEF) shown in means (±SD). Means (±SD) of the 4-min post-stress recovery phase of heart rate (HR), skin conductance (SC), and respiration rate (RSP) are shown in percentage (in relation to the 100% reference, means of the 1-min stressor phase)

ISSN: 1880-6805