Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Physiological Anthropology

Fig. 2

From: Energy cost and lower leg muscle activities during erect bipedal locomotion under hyperoxia

Fig. 2

Comparisons of cardiorespiratory parameters between normoxia and hyperoxia on each gradient. a SpO2 on the level and b uphill gradient. c VE on the level and d uphill gradient. e PETCO2 on the level and f uphill gradient. g \( \dot{V}{\mathrm{O}}_2 \) on the level and h uphill gradient. i \( \dot{V}{\mathrm{CO}}_2 \) on the level and j uphill gradient. k HR on the level and l uphill gradient, respectively. Open circles and squares represent walking under normoxia and hyperoxia. Filled circles and squares represent running under normoxia and hyperoxia. To avoid overlapping plots at each speed, normoxic and hyperoxic data were plotted 0.1 km h−1 slower or faster than the actual speeds. +p < 0.05, *p < 0.01, and #p < 0.001 between normoxia and hyperoxia

Back to article page