Skip to main content

Table 4 Fluctuating asymmetry—correlation method

From: Qualitative and quantitative dermatoglyphics of chronic kidney disease of unknown origin (CKDu) in Sri Lanka

 

CASES

EC

CASES vs EC P

NEC

CASES vs NEC P

EC vs NEC P

1-r2

1-r2

1-r2

Female

D1 RC

0.46

0.47

0.93

0.42

0.68

0.62

D2 RC

0.61

0.47

0.22

0.38

0.03*

0.36

D3 RC

0.46

0.42

0.71

0.37

0.31

0.52

D4 RC

0.33

0.33

0.92

0.38

0.52

0.58

D5 RC

0.39

0.30

0.30

0.39

0.98

0.31

TRC

0.17

0.18

0.85

0.15

0.65

0.52

A-B RC

0.46

0.49

0.73

0.34

0.23

0.12

Male

D1 RC

0.42

0.38

0.65

0.48

0.60

0.32

D2 RC

0.47

0.47

0.95

0.55

0.45

0.22

D3 RC

0.48

0.59

0.31

0.28

0.02*

0.00*

D4 RC

0.39

0.41

0.80

0.21

0.02*

0.01*

D5 RC

0.59

0.44

0.19

0.41

0.10

0.73

TRC

0.18

0.17

0.76

0.17

0.88

0.87

A-B RC

0.38

0.55

0.10

0.32

0.45

0.02*

  1. TRC total ridge count, A-B RC A-B ridge count, r pearson product-moment correlation coefficients, P P value, * significant values 
  2. *Fisher’s Z test for significant differences