Open Access

Association between body mass index and muscularity in healthy older Japanese women and men

Journal of Physiological AnthropologyAn official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology (JSPA)201332:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-6805-32-4

Received: 14 September 2012

Accepted: 15 February 2013

Published: 4 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Body mass index (BMI), expressed as the ratio of body mass to height squared (kg/m2), involves not only fat but also lean mass. The present study aimed to clarify how BMI is associated with total muscle mass (TMM) in older Japanese women and men.

Findings

Using a B-mode ultrasound apparatus, muscle thickness was measured at nine sites (forearm, upper arm anterior and posterior, thigh anterior and posterior, lower leg anterior and posterior, abdomen, and subscapular) for 346 women (BMI 16.40 to 33.11 kg/m2) and 286 men (BMI 16.86 to 31.18 kg/m2) aged 60.0 to 79.5 yrs. TMM was estimated using the product of the sum of the muscle thicknesses at the nine sites with height as an independent variable. For both sexes, the estimated TMM relative to height squared was significantly correlated with BMI (r = 0.688, P< 0.0001 for women; r = 0.696, P< 0.0001 for men), but the percentage of the estimated TMM in body mass was not.

Conclusion

These results indicate that, for older Japanese women and men, BMI is a simple and convenient index for assessing total muscularity.

Keywords

Muscle thickness Estimated muscle mass B-mode ultrasonography

Background

Body mass index (BMI) is widely used for assessing overweight and obesity[1]. However, the association between BMI and the percentage of body fat mass (%BF) in body mass is influenced by age, sex, and ethnicity[27]. Some studies have suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of BMI to detect excess body adiposity diminishes with increasing age of the person being assessed[8, 9]. Romero-Corral et al.[9] found that the correlation between BMI and %BF was lower in older than in younger subjects, but the correlation between BMI and lean mass was similar across age groups. Micozzi and Harris[10] suggested that, based on anthropometric measurements, the ratios of body mass to height2 and height1.5 in men and women, respectively, are more closely correlated with estimates of body fat in younger than in older adults, and with estimates of muscle mass in older than in younger adults. This suggests that, for the elderly individual, BMI may be a simple and convenient index for assessing muscularity. This assumption has already been examined using populations aged 60 and over[1013]. Iannuzzi-Sucich et al.[11] indicated that BMI is a strong predictor of skeletal-muscle mass in older Caucasian women and men. In their study, using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), BMI was shown to account for 48% and 50% of the variance in appendicular skeletal muscle mass in women and men, respectively. However, in other studies, the r2 values between BMI and muscle mass were not so high (r2 = 0.22 to 0.40)[10, 12, 13]. The reasons for these lower r2 values are unknown, but it might be due to the fact that the previous studies used muscle girth or area estimated from the anthropometric data of the upper arm[10, 13] or the upper arm and calf[12].

Gallagher et al.[4] reported that the middle-aged and older Japanese population had a higher %BF for any given BMI than did white and African-American populations. Considering this, whether the findings of Iannuzzi-Sucich et al.[11] can be applied to the elderly Japanese population remains unclear. Furthermore, it seems strange that the previous studies cited above correlated the measures obtained from a limited number limbs with BMI, which is an index representing the total body. To our knowledge, no study has examined how total muscle mass is associated with BMI in elderly individuals. Thus, the present study aimed to examine the association between BMI and muscle mass in elderly Japanese individuals of both sexes. To this end, we determined muscle thicknesses at nine sites of the body using B-mode ultrasonography. The product of the sum of muscle thicknesses at these nine sites with height was shown to have a high correlation with total muscle mass (TMM) in a sample of Japanese women and men[14]. The equation with the product of the two variables as an independent variable for predicting TMM, developed in the previous study[14], has been successfully used to examine age-related muscle loss in Japanese men and women aged 20 to 95 years[15]. Using of the prediction equation, therefore, the present study estimated TMM for an older population. We hypothesized that, for the elderly population, the estimated TMM relative to height squared would be significantly correlated with BMI, but its value relative to body mass would not.

Methods

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan, and was consistent with the institutional ethics requirements for human experimentation in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects were fully informed of the purpose and risks of the experiment, and gave their written informed consent.

Subjects

A group of 346 women and 286 men aged 60.0 to 79.5 years voluntarily participated in this study. None of the subjects was or had been an athlete. Moreover, none was using walking sticks or other walking aids ,and all were functionally independent in daily life. In addition, no participant was on an extreme diet or using any major medications, such as chemotherapy, cardiac, respiratory, or antipsychotic drugs. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for age, height, body mass, and BMI are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Descriptive data on the measured variables a,b

Variables

Women, n = 346

Men, n = 286

Age, years

69.4 ± 4.9

69.8 ± 4.7

Height, cm

150.1 ± 5.4

163.4 ± 6.0

Body mass, kg

53.6 ± 7.1

63.5 ± 8.

BMI, kg/m2

23.77 ± 2.77

23.76 ± 2.58

Muscle thickness, mm

  

Forearm

19.1 ± 3.4

22.6 ± 4.2

Upper arm anterior

28.4 ± 3.8

33.3 ± 4.6

Upper arm posterior

26.9 ± 4.7

32.8 ± 5.1

Thigh anterior

38.1 ± 5.6

42.1 ± 6.1

Thigh posterior

56.6 ± 7.0

61.9 ± 7.5

Lower leg anterior

25.9 ± 2.8

28.7 ± 3.2

Lower leg posterior

59.5 ± 4.6

66.0 ± 5.6

Subscapular

18.2 ± 4.3

21.1 ± 4.7

Abdomen

7.6 ± 1.7

10.4 ± 2.1

SMTc, mm

280.3 ± 21.4

319.8 ± 27.7

TMMd, kg

13.8 ± 2.6

20.8 ± 3.7

TMM/ht2,e kg/m2

6.10 ± 0.99

7.77 ± 1.15

%TMMf

25.7 ± 3.1

32.7 ± 3.5

aValues are mean ± SD.

bAll listed variables except for age and BMI were significantly greater (P<0.0001) in men than in women.

cSum of the muscle thickness values at nine sites.

dEstimated total muscle mass.

eTMM relative to height squared.

fPercentage of TMM in body mass.

Muscle thickness measurements

Muscle thickness was measured at nine sites (forearm, upper arm anterior and posterior, thigh anterior and posterior, lower leg anterior and posterior, abdomen, and subscapular) on the right side of the body, using a real time B-mode ultrasound apparatus (SSD-500, Aloka Co., Tokyo, Japan). The position of the subjects during the ultrasonographic measurements, the site selected for obtaining cross-sectional images, and determination of muscle thickness at each site were the same as those described in a previous study[15]. The sum of muscle thicknesses at the nine sites (SMT) was used to estimate TMM. TMM was estimated using the prediction equation developed by Sanada et al.[14]: TMM (kg) = 0.687 × SMT (cm) × body height (m) − 15.122 (R2 = 0.96, SEE = 1.1 kg). In addition to the absolute value, the estimated TMM relative to height squared (TMM/ht2, kg/m2) and the percentage of the estimated TMM in body mass (%TMM) were calculated, and used to examine how muscularity and the relative distribution of muscle mass within body mass are associated with BMI.

Statistics

Descriptive values are presented as mean ± SD. An unpaired Student’s t-test was used to test the differences between men and women in the measured variables. A simple linear regression analysis was used to calculate the coefficient of correlation between BMI and TMM/ht2 or %TMM. The probability level for statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

All measured variables except for age and BMI were significantly greater in men than in women (Table 1). TMM/ht2 was significantly correlated with BMI in both women (r = 0.688, P< 0.0001) and men (r = 0.696, P< 0.0001) (Figure 1). However, %TMM was not significantly associated with BMI in either sex: r = −0.024 (P>0.05) for women and r = −0.029 (P>0.05) for men (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Relationship between BMI and TMM/ht 2 .

Figure 2

Relationship between BMI and %TMM.

Discussion

The current results support our hypothesis regarding the association between BMI and muscle mass, and indicate that, for the elderly person, BMI is an index that assesses total muscularity rather than the relative distribution of muscle mass within the total body. Based on the r2 values, BMI accounted for 47% and 48% of the variance in TMM/ht2 in women and men, respectively. These values are higher than those reported in previous studies using anthropometric approaches for predicting muscle size[10, 12, 13], and are comparable those in the study of Iannuzzi-Sucich et al.[11] who used DXA to determine appendicular skeletal muscle mass. In the present study, we estimated the total muscle mass by using a prediction equation developed by Sanada et al.[14]. Based on the report of Sanada et al.[14], the accuracy of the ultrasonography prediction model for estimating TMM is greater than that of anthropometric and bioelectrical impedance prediction models, and is similar to that of DXA prediction models and whole-body 40K counting. This may explain the aforementioned difference in the observed r2 between the current study and previous reports using anthropometric model. However, it should be noted that the number of subjects in our study categorized as underweight (BMI< 18.50 kg/m2) or obese (30.00 kg/m2 or higher)[1] was small (23; 3.6%). The correlation coefficient of the associations between BMI and TMM/ht2 was found to be lower for subjects with BMI greater than 25 (women: r = 0.468, P< 0.001, men: r = 0.448, P< 0.0001) than for subjects with BMI less than 25 (women: r = 0.660, P< 0.0001, men: r = 0.630, P< 0.0001). This implies a limitation on the use of BMI as an index for assessing muscularity in elderly individuals with relation to the magnitude of BMI. Further studies examining individuals categorized as either underweight or obese are needed to clarify this finding.

Abbreviations

%BF: 

Percentage of body fat mass in body mass

BMI: 

Body mass index

TMM: 

Total muscle mass

SMT: 

Sum of muscle thicknesses at the nine sites

TMM/ht2: 

Estimated TMM relative to height squared

%TMM: 

Percentage of the estimated TMM in body mass

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by financial aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (no. 1248007).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya

References

  1. WHO expert consultation: Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implication for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004, 363: 157-163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Deurenberg P, Weststrate JA, Seidell JC: Body mass index as a measure of body fatness: age- and sex-specific prediction formulas. Br J Nutr. 1991, 65: 105-114. 10.1079/BJN19910073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB: How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups?. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 228-239. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008733.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Heo M, Jebb SA, Murgatroyd PR, Sakamoto Y: Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approch for developing guidelines on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 72: 694-701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson AS, Stanforth PR, Gagnon J, Rankinen T, Leon AS, Rao DC, Skinner JS, Bouchard C, Wilmore JH: The effect of sex, age and race on estimating percentage body fat from body mass index: The Heritage Family Study. Int J Obes Relat Disord. 2002, 26: 789-796.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Meeuwsen S, Horgan GW, Elia M: The relationship between BMI and percent body fat, measured by bioelectrical impedance, in a large adult sample is curvilinear and influenced by age and sex. Clin Nutr. 2010, 29: 560-566. 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.12.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rush E, Freitas I, Plank LD: Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nurt. 2009, 102: 632-641. 10.1017/S0007114508207221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumgartner RN, Heymsfield SB, Roche AF: Human body composition and the epidemiology of chronic disease. Obes Res. 1995, 3: 73-95. 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1995.tb00124.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Romero-Corral A, Somers VK, Sierra-Johnson J, Thomas RJ, Bailey KR, Collazo-Clavell NL, Allison TG, Korinek J, Baysis JA, Lopez-Jimenez FL: Accuracy of body mass index to diagnose obesity in the US adult population. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008, 32: 959-966. 10.1038/ijo.2008.11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Micozzi MS, Harris TM: Age variations in the relation of body mass indices to estimates of body fat and muscle mass. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990, 81: 375-379. 10.1002/ajpa.1330810307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Iannuzzi-Sucich M, Prestwood KM, Kenny AM: Prevalence of sarcopenia and predictors of skeletal muscle mass in healthy, older men and women. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2002, 57A: M772-M777.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ross WD, Crawford SM, Ward KR, Bailey DA, Mirwald RM: Relationship of the body mass index with skinfolds, girths, and bone breadths in Canadian men and women aged 20–70 years. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988, 77: 169-173. 10.1002/ajpa.1330770204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Lennon L, Whincup PH: Decreased muscle mass and increased central adiposity are independently related to mortality in older men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86: 1339-1346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sanada K, Kearns CF, Midorikawa T, Abe T: Prediction and varidation of total and regional skeletal muscle mass by ultrasound in Japanese adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006, 96: 24-31. 10.1007/s00421-005-0061-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Abe T, Sakamaki M, Yasuda T, Bemben MG, Kondo M, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T: Age-related, site-specific muscle loss in 1507 Japanese men and women aged 20 to 95 years. J Sports Sci Med. 2011, 10: 145-150.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kanehisa and Fukunaga; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement