Open Access

Sex differences in acetylcholine-induced sweating responses due to physical training

  • Yoshimitsu Inoue1Email author,
  • Tomoko Ichinose-Kuwahara1,
  • Chie Funaki1,
  • Hiroyuki Ueda2,
  • Yutaka Tochihara3 and
  • Narihiko Kondo4
Journal of Physiological AnthropologyAn official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology (JSPA)201433:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-6805-33-13

Received: 22 November 2013

Accepted: 9 May 2014

Published: 29 May 2014

Abstract

Purpose

The present study examined sex differences in the sweat gland response to acetylcholine (ACh) in physically trained and untrained male and female subjects.

Methods

Sweating responses were induced on the forearm and thigh in resting subjects by ACh iontophoresis using a 10% solution at 2 mA for 5 min at 26°C and 50% relative humidity.

Results

The ACh-induced sweating rate (SR) on the forearm and thigh was greater in physically trained male (P < 0.001 for the forearm and thigh, respectively) and female (P = 0.08 for the forearm, P < 0.001 for the thigh) subjects than in untrained subjects of both sexes. The SR was also significantly greater in physically trained males compared to females at both sites (P < 0.001) and in untrained males compared to females on the thigh (P < 0.02) only, although the degree of difference was greater in trained subjects than in untrained subjects. These sex differences can be attributed to the difference in sweat output per gland rather than the number of activated sweat glands.

Conclusion

We conclude that physical training enhances the ACh-induced SR in both sexes but that the degree of enhancement is greater in male than in female subjects. The effects of physical training and sex on the SR may be due to changes in peripheral sensitivity to ACh and/or sweat gland size.

Keywords

SweatingSexPhysical trainingAcetylcholineIontophoresis

Introduction

One of the effector responses to imposition of internal (exercise) or external heat stress is sweating. Physical training improves sweating responses [15], resulting in an increase of sweating rate at a given core temperature. Measurement of the frequency of sweat expulsion [6] and methylcholine injection tests [2] suggest that physical training improves the sensitivity of peripheral mechanisms. However, these results have been obtained primarily from male subjects. Thus, sex differences in sweating enhancement induced by long-term physical training are not fully understood.

The secretion of reproductive hormones is enhanced at puberty, leading to sex differences in physical characteristics and functions. It has been reported that testosterone enhances while estradiol inhibits the sweating response [7]. Testosterone is increased by physical training [8], but the degree of increase in testosterone caused by physical training is smaller in female subjects than in male subjects [9]. These results suggest that the effects of physical training on sweating should be more marked in male than in female subjects.

By examining the sweating rate (SR) and sweat output per gland (SGO) during graded exercise among physically trained and untrained male and female subjects, Ichinose-Kuwahara et al. [10] observed that the degree of improvement in sweating response was smaller in female than in male subjects, and that this sex difference was more pronounced with increased exercise intensity. These findings have been challenged by Schwiening et al. [11], who suggested that differences in absolute exercise intensity and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) among groups produced the group differences in SR. However, their challenge remains controversial [12]. The sweat response during exercise is difficult to analyze because it is influenced by various factors, including the degree of thermogenesis during relatively intense exercise, elevation in body temperature during absolute intensity exercise, and physiological functioning of the sweat gland itself. To confirm our previous findings with respect to sex differences in the effect of physical training on sweat responses [10], more accurate measurements of sweating responses using a pharmacological stimulus [2, 13, 14], which excludes factors associated with exercise, might offer significant information.

In this study, we compared the sweating response to acetylcholine (ACh) on the forearm and thigh in physically trained and untrained male and female subjects to examine the effects of physical training on sex differences related to peripheral sweat glandular sensitivity.

Methods

Subjects

In total, 68 volunteers, including 21 physically trained female (TF), 21 untrained female (UF), 14 physically trained male (TM), and 12 untrained male (UM) subjects, participated in this study. The physiological characteristics of the subjects are shown in Table 1. Except for gymnastics lessons, the untrained subjects had not performed regular physical activity for the previous 3 years, while the trained subjects had participated in endurance sports throughout the year for more than 6 years. The trained male subjects belonged to a track club (long- or middle-distance running team) and the trained female subjects belonged to a track (long- or middle-distance running team) or softball club at university. The male and female runners had trained 2 to 3 h/day on 5 days/wk and the female softball players had trained 4 to 5 h/day on 6 days/wk. No female subjects had taken oral contraceptives, which contain female reproductive hormones, and all had self-reported regular menstrual cycles of about 28 days. The purpose and procedures of the study were explained to the subjects prior to the study, and their informed consent was obtained. This study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee for human investigation of Osaka International University (Osaka, Japan).
Table 1

Physical characteristics of each exercise group

 

Age,

Height,

Mass,

AD/mass,

MSF,

VO2max,

 

years

cm

kg

cm2/kg

mm

ml/kg/minute

TF

21.2 ± 0.3

158.7 ± 1.5a

53.1 ± 1.4a

282.1 ± 3.1

13.4 ± 0.5ab

50.4 ± 1.4ab

UF

21.6 ± 0.3

162.1 ± 1.1a

53.5 ± 1.3a

284.7 ± 3.4

18.0 ± 0.8a

38.3 ± 1.0

TM

20.8 ± 0.4

169.3 ± 1.5

60.2 ± 2.9

275.8 ± 4.8

8.7 ± 0.9

56.4 ± 1.6b

UM

21.7 ± 0.3

173.8 ± 1.2

61.0 ± 2.0

277.5 ± 4.6

9.5 ± 1.1

37.6 ± 1.8

The values are means ± standard error of the mean for 21 young trained female (TF), 21 young untrained female (UF), 14 young trained male (TM), and 12 young untrained male (UM) subjects. aSignificant difference between the sexes for each training status (P <0.05). bSignificant difference between the untrained and trained subjects of each sex. AD, body surface area; MSF, mean skinfold thickness; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake.

Protocol

The subjects wore a minimal amount of clothing consisting of a sports bra, short pants, and shorts for female subjects and short pants and briefs for male subjects. After measuring his or her height, body mass, and skinfold thickness, the subject entered an environmental chamber (SRH-30VEVI2; Nagano Science, Osaka, Japan), which was maintained at 26°C and 50% relative humidity. The subject stayed in a sitting position on a chair while the measurement devices were applied. After 40 minutes of stabilization, the ACh iontophoresis test was conducted in the resting subject. The VO2max for each subject was estimated in a submaximal step-load cycle exercise test, performed after the ACh iontophoresis test. All of the female subjects performed the ACh iontophoresis test during the early or mid-follicular phase, defined as 4 to 10 days after the onset of menstruation, to control the effect of the menstrual cycle on heat-loss responses [15, 16]. The entire study was conducted between late August and late October, so that the subjects were naturally acclimatized to heat.

Measurements

The body surface area of each subject was calculated based on his or her height and mass according to the method of Fujimoto and Watanabe [17]; in addition, the percent body fat was assessed as the mean value of the skinfold thickness measured with skinfold calipers over the chest, flank, back, triceps, front of the forearm and thigh, and back of the lower leg.

To estimate the VO2max, each subject performed submaximal exercise at four different intensities on a cycle ergometer pedaling at a constant frequency of 50 rpm for 5 minutes without rest between exercise periods. The submaximal exercise was selected to secure the safety of untrained subjects. The VO2 (AE300S; Minato Medical Science Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan) and heart rate (HR: DS-7500; Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) were measured during the final minute of each exercise period, after which the VO2max was estimated for each subject by extrapolating the relationship between VO2 and HR to the estimated maximal HR.

Iontophoresis (Iontophoresis CI-5.0; Sukinosu Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) was performed on the skin surface of the forearm and thigh. Two capsules (2.613 cm2) for transporting ACh to the skin and for measuring the ACh-induced sweating response were prepared: a 10% ACh solution absorbed into the sponge in the first capsule and ACh transported iontophoretically at 2 mA into the skin of the forearm or thigh for 5 minutes. Immediately after cessation of the current, the capsule was detached, the skin area under the capsule was wiped dry, and the capsule was replaced by a second capsule. Sweating was measured continuously for 7 minutes immediately after the iontophoresis current was stopped using the second capsule. The exchange procedures for the capsules took less than 20 seconds. Sweat production was determined using the capacitance hygrometer-ventilated capsule method [10, 18]. In brief, nitrogen gas was passed through the second capsule at a constant flow rate of 300 ml/minute, and the change in relative humidity of the effluent gas was detected by means of a hygrometer (HMP 133Y; Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland). The hygrometer output signals for sweating were recorded at a sampling rate of 50 Hz, and data were captured and stored via a data logger (model MP 100WS; Biopac, Goleta, CA, USA). The mean SR (in mg/cm2/minute) was calculated using the data for the last 5 minutes of measurement. Next, the activated sweat gland (ASG) density was determined using the starch-iodide technique [19], and the SGO was calculated by dividing the SR by the ASG.

The oral (Tor) and skin (Tsl; at the forearm or thigh) temperatures were measured immediately before iontophoresis using thermistor probes (SZL64; Takara Thermistor Instruments, Yokohama, Japan). The Tor and Tsl were taken every 30 seconds with a computer-controlled data logger (model K722; Takara Thermistor Instruments). The Tor was determined as the temperature at which no change was observed in consecutive Tor measurements after the probe had been held sublingually in a closed mouth for at least 5 minutes. The measurement of Tsl was made by affixing the probe to the skin with surgical tape (Micropore TM, Surgical tape 1530–1).

Data analysis and statistics

The primary effects of training status and sex differences were analyzed across conditions using one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Tukey post-hoc test was used to identify differences among group means. The relationships between VO2max and ACh-induced SR, ASG, and SGO were analyzed by calculation Pearson product–moment correlation coefficients. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 11.5; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All data are reported as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was set at P <0.05.

Results

Effects of physical training

Table 1 shows the physical characteristics of the subject groups. No group differences were observed in age, height, mass, and ratio of skin surface area to mass (AD/mass) between the trained and untrained groups for each sex. Mean skinfold thickness (MSF) were significantly lower (P <0.001) in the TF group than in the UF group, and VO2max was significantly higher (P <0.001) in the TF and TM groups than in the UF and UM groups. The baseline Tor and Tsl on the forearm or thigh was also not different between the trained and untrained groups for each sex (Table 2).
Table 2

Baseline oral (T or ) and skin (T sl ) temperatures on the forearm and thigh

 

Tor,°C

Tslon the forearm, °C

Tslon the thigh, °C

TF

36.56 ± 0.06

32.85 ± 0.15a

31.97 ± 0.27

UF

36.71 ± 0.07

32.83 ± 0.13

32.20 ± 0.13

TM

36.76 ± 0.06

33.50 ± 0.19

32.72 ± 0.20

UM

36.70 ± 0.08

33.34 ± 0.20

32.89 ± 0.22

The values are means ± standard error of the mean for 21 young trained female (TF), 21 young untrained female (UF), 14 young trained male (TM), and 12 young untrained male (UM) subjects. aSignificant difference between the sexes for each training status (P <0.05).

The ACh-induced SR and SGO on the thigh of the female subjects were significantly greater (P <0.001) in the TF group (SR and SGO: 0.559 ± 0.026 mg/cm2/minute and 5.822 ± 0.293 μg/gland/minute) than in the UF group (SR and SGO: 0.333 ± 0.021 mg/cm2/minute and 3.828 ± 0.195 μg/gland/minute), but there was a tendency, albeit not significant, towards greater SR (P = 0.08) and SGO (P = 0.06) on the forearm in the TF group (SR and SGO: 0.605 ± 0.026 mg/cm2/minute and 4.716 ± 0.191 μg/gland/minute) than in the UF group (SR and SGO: 0.459 ± 0.027 mg/cm2/minute and 3.658 ± 0.223 μg/gland/minute). In contrast, the SR and SGO on the forearm and thigh of the male subjects were significantly greater (P <0.001) in the trained group (forearm SR and SGO: 0.881 ± 0.092 mg/cm2/minute and 7.015 ± 0.576 μg/gland/minute; thigh SR and SGO: 0.851 ± 0.061 mg/cm2/minute and 9.192 ± 0.555 μg/gland/minute) than in the untrained group (forearm SR and SGO: 0.585 ± 0.044 mg/cm2/minute and 4.734 ± 0.345 μg/gland/minute; thigh SR and SGO: 0.496 ± 0.047 mg/cm2/minute and 5.507 ± 0.460 μg/gland/minute) (Figure 1). Physical training status did not affect the ASG on the forearm and thigh in either sex (forearm and thigh ASG for TF, UF, TM and UM group: 130.9 ± 6.0, 128.3 ± 5.5, 125.0 ± 6.2, and 124.9 ± 6.2 glands/cm2, 98.7 ± 4.9, 87.6 ± 3.6, 94.3 ± 5.8, and 91.6 ± 5.6 glands/cm2, respectively).
Figure 1

Sweating rate (SR), number of active sweat glands (ASG), and sweat gland output (SGO) on the forearm and thigh induced by acetylcholine (ACh) applied iontophoretically in physically trained female (TF) or male (TM) subjects and untrained female (UF) or male (UM) subjects. The values are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *Significant difference between the untrained and trained subjects. Significant difference between the sexes for each training status (P <0.05).

Effects of sex

There were no sex differences in age or AD/mass due to physical training status (Table 1). The TF and UF groups had significantly lower height (P <0.001) and mass (P <0.05) and higher MSF values (P <0.001) than the TM and UM groups. VO2max was significantly lower in the TF group than the TM group (P <0.02), but no such difference was noted between the UF and UM groups (Table 1).

No sex differences were noted in baseline Tor and Tsl on the thigh due to physical training status (Table 2). The Tsl on the forearm was significantly lower (P <0.04) in the TF subjects compared to the TM subjects, but no such difference was noted between the UF and UM groups.

In the trained subjects, the SR and SGO on the forearm and thigh were significantly lower (P <0.001) in the TF group versus the TM group. In the untrained subjects, the SR and SGO were significantly lower (P <0.02) in the UF group than the UM group on the thigh, but not on the forearm. There were no sex differences in ASG on the forearm and thigh due to physical training status (Figure 1).

Relationships between VO2max and ACh-induced sweating

Figure 2 depicts the relationships between VO2max and SR or SGO on the forearm and thigh in female and male subjects. The SR and SGO on the forearm and thigh were significantly correlated with the VO2max for each sex (forearm SR and SGO for female: r = 0.42, P <0.01 and r = 0.32, P <0.05: forearm SR and SGO for male: r = 0.51, P <0.01 and r = 0.51, P <0.01; thigh SR and SGO for female: r = 0.58, P <0.001 and r = 0.48, P <0.001; forearm SR and SGO for male subjects: r = 0.61, P <0.001 and r = 0.68, P <0.001). The slopes of regression lines were markedly smaller in the female versus male subjects (forearm SR: 0.007 versus 0.014 (mg/cm2/minute)/(ml/kg/minute), thigh SR: 0.011 versus 0.014 (mg/cm2/minute)/(ml/kg/minute), forearm SGO: 0.041 versus 0.095 (μg/gland/minute)/(ml/kg/minute), thigh SGO: 0.088 versus 0.157 (μg/gland/minute)/(ml/kg/minute)). There was no significant correlation between VO2max and ASG in either sex.
Figure 2

Correlation between the maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) and sweating rate (SR) or sweat gland output (SGO) on the forearm and thigh caused by acetylcholine (ACh) iontophoresis in the female (open circles) and male subjects (closed circles).

Discussion

The present study determined that ACh-induced sweating responses were lower in female versus male subjects, and that physical endurance training enhanced the sweating response of both sexes. The degree of sweating response enhancement with endurance training was also smaller in female than in male subjects. These findings suggest that sex differences in peripheral sudomotor sensitivity to ACh were increased by endurance training.

Irrespective of sex, endurance training increased the ACh-induced SR at the tested forearm and thigh. Although ASG was not markedly changed by endurance training status, the SGO and SR were increased in both sexes. These results indicate that endurance training enhances the SR and that this enhanced response can be attributed to SGO improvement and not to changes in the number of ASG. Sato and Sato [13] reported that the sweat glands of subjects judged to be poor sweaters were smaller and had lower secretory activity and cholinergic sensitivity compared with glands from physically fit subjects. Based on this result, it has been suggested that endurance training improves the size or cholinergic sensitivity of sweat glands in female and male subjects, and that there are sex differences in the improvement in size or cholinergic sensitivity of sweat glands.

In the present study, there were remarkable sex differences in SR and SGO due to physical training status, but there was no sex difference in ASG number. These results suggest that the lower SR in the female subjects was not due to a smaller number of ASG, but to a lower SGO. In this regard, the sex differences in SR and SGO observed in the untrained subjects were more pronounced in the trained subjects because the degree of enhancement in SR and SGO with endurance training was smaller in female subjects than in male subjects. For example, the sex difference in SGO on the forearm increased from 1.08 μg/gland/minute in the untrained subjects to 2.30 μg/gland/minute in the trained subjects. Similarly, the sex difference in SGO on the thigh increased from 1.68 μg/gland/minute to 3.37 μg/gland/minute. We also found that VO2max, which affects sweating capacity, was significantly lower in the TF than the TM (Table 1), although it was not different between the UF and UM. Therefore, sex differences in VO2max might be partially responsible for the greater sex differences in SR and SGO. In contrast, SR and SGO were significantly correlated with VO2max in both sexes, and the regression analysis lines were markedly lower with smaller slopes in the female subjects than the male subjects. These data strongly suggest that peripheral sweat glandular function is enhanced by physical training in female subjects, although the degree of enhancement is lower in female than in male subjects. This finding is in agreement with previous data showing that the degree of increased exercise-induced SGO with physical training was smaller in female than in male subjects [10]. The present findings strongly contradict the conclusion of Schwiening et al. [11]; namely, that the differences in absolute exercise intensity and VO2max result in sex differences in SR during exercise.

Kawahata [7] reported that testosterone enhanced, while estradiol inhibited, the sweating response. Subsequent studies showed that physical training increased testosterone in both sexes [8], but the increase was considerably smaller in female than in male subjects [9]. In the light of these results, our present finding that SR and SGO were similarly enhanced by endurance training to a greater degree in male than in female subjects suggests the possible involvement of testosterone in this enhancement, although testosterone levels were not measured in this study.

Sweating in response to pharmacological stimulation is affected by the local skin temperature [20]. However, since there were no differences in the baseline Tsl on the forearm and thigh between the trained and untrained groups of either sex, local skin temperature does not appear to contribute to the higher ACh-induced SR in the trained group versus the untrained group. The sex differences in baseline Tsl on the forearm for training status were similar to the sex differences in SR. Therefore, although we cannot exclude the possibility that the sex difference in ACh-induced SR on the forearm observed in the present study was influenced by differences in Tsl regardless of physical status, the sex differences that we observed might reflect general differences in sweating since the differences were less than 0.7°C.

In summary, although the sweating responses to ACh were lower in female but not male subjects, endurance training improved these responses regardless of sex. Sex differences do exist in the degree of ACh-induced sweating responses with endurance training since the degree of enhancement was smaller in the female versus male subjects. Therefore, we conclude that sex differences in ACh-induced sweating responses are increased by endurance training. In terms of biological significance, our present findings of lower sweat gland function in female subjects, together with previous findings of their lower body fluid content, allow us to speculate that they might control body fluid loss by reducing excessive sweat in exercise and/or a hot environment. More detailed examination of sex differences in effective and ineffective (dripping) sweating rates during exercise should help clarify this point.

Abbreviations

ACh: 

acetylcholine

AD: 

body surface area

ASG: 

activated sweat gland

HR: 

heart rate

MSF: 

mean skinfold thickness

SR: 

sweating rate

SGO: 

sweat output per gland

TF: 

trained female subjects

TM: 

physically trained male subjects

Tor

oral temperature

Tsl

skin temperature

UF: 

untrained female subjects

UM: 

untrained male subjects

VO2max

maximal oxygen uptake.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by Grants-in-Aid of Scientific Research (A) (grant numbers, 21247040 and 23247046).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory for Human Performance Research, Osaka International University
(2)
Osaka Shin-ai College
(3)
Kyushu University
(4)
Kobe University

References

  1. Yamazaki F, Fujii N, Sone R, Ikegami H: Responses of sweating and body temperature to sinusoidal exercise in physically trained men. J Appl Physiol. 1996, 80: 491-495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Inoue Y, Havenith G, Kenney WL, Loomis JL, Buskirk ER: Exercise- and methylcholine-induced sweating responses in older and younger men: effect of heat acclimation and aerobic fitness. Int J Biometeorol. 1999, 42: 210-216. 10.1007/s004840050107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Thomas CM, Pierzga JM, Kenney WL: Aerobic training and cutaneous vasodilation in young and older men. J Appl Physiol. 1999, 86: 1676-1686. 10.1063/1.370946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Patterson MJ, Stocks JM, Taylor NA: Humid heat acclimation does not elicit a preferential sweat redistribution toward the limbs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004, 286: R512-R518. 10.1152/ajpregu.00359.2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM: Effects of training, environment, and host factors on the sweating response to exercise. Int J Sports Med. 1998, 1998: S103-S105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yamazaki F, Fujii N, Sone R, Ikegami H: Mechanisms of potentiation in sweating induced by long-term physical training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994, 69: 228-232. 10.1007/BF01094793.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kawahata A: Sex Differences In Sweating. Essential Problems In Climatic Physiology. Edited by: Ito S, Ogata H, Yoshimura H. 1960, Kyoto, Japan: Nankodo Publ, 169-184.Google Scholar
  8. Zakas A, Mandroukas K, Karamouzis M, Panagiotopoulou G: Physical training, growth hormone and testosterone levels and blood pressure in prepubertal, pubertal and adolescent boys. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1994, 4: 113-118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Keizer H, Janssen GM, Menheere P, Kranenburg G: Changes in basal plasma testosterone, cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in previously untrained males and females preparing for a marathon. Int J Sports Med. 1989, 10 (Suppl 3): S139-S145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ichinose-Kuwahara T, Inoue Y, Iseki Y, Hara S, Kondo N: Sex differences in effects of physical training on sweat gland responses during a graded exercise. Exp Physiol. 2010, 95: 1026-1032. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.053710.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwiening CJ, Mason MJ, Thompson M: Absolute power, not sex promotes perspiration. Exp Physiol. 2011, 96: 556-558. 10.1113/expphysiol.2010.055996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ichinose-Kuwahara T, Inoue Y: Authors’ response to C Schwiening’s commentary. Exp Physiol. 2011, 96: 559-560. 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.057182.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sato K, Sato F: Individual variations in structure and function of human eccrine sweat gland. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 1983, 245: R203-R208.Google Scholar
  14. Buono MJ, Sjoholm NT: Effects of physical training on peripheral sweat production. J Appl Physiol. 1988, 65: 811-814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuwahara T, Inoue Y, Abe M, Sato Y, Kondo N: Effects of menstrual cycle and physical training on heat loss responses during dynamic exercise at moderate intensity in a temperate environment. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005, 288: R1347-R1353. 10.1152/ajpregu.00547.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuwahara T, Inoue Y, Taniguchi M, Ogura Y, Ueda H, Kondo N: Effects of physical training on heat loss responses of young women to passive heating in relation to menstrual cycle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005, 94: 376-385. 10.1007/s00421-005-1329-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujimoto S, Watanabe T: Studies on the body surface area of Japanese. Acta med Nagasaki. 1969, 13: 1-13.Google Scholar
  18. Ichinose TK, Inoue Y, Hirata M, Shamsuddin AKM, Kondo N: Enhanced heat loss responses induced by short-term endurance training in exercising women. Exp Physiol. 2009, 94: 90-102. 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.043810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Inoue Y, Nakao M, Araki T, Murakami H: Regional differences in the sweating responses of older and younger men. J Appl Physiol. 1991, 71: 2453-2459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ogawa T: Local effect of skin temperature on threshold concentration of sudorific agents. J Appl Physiol. 1970, 28: 18-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Inoue et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement