Open Access

Radiologic evaluation of orbital index among Ghanaians using CT scan

  • Benard Ohene Botwe1Email author,
  • Derick Seyram Sule1 and
  • Abdul Mumin Ismael1
Journal of Physiological AnthropologyAn official journal of the Japan Society of Physiological Anthropology (JSPA)201736:29

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-017-0145-7

Received: 1 March 2017

Accepted: 30 June 2017

Published: 11 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Orbital index (OI) expresses the proportion of the orbital height to the orbital width and varies with race, regions within the same race and periods in evolution. This index is useful in forensic medicine, anthropology and surgery. However, the average OI among Ghanaian adults was unknown.

Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the orbital index of adult Ghanaians and classify them under one of the three predetermined groups.

Method

The study design was a retrospective cross-sectional. A systematic random sampling method was used for selecting 350 adult Ghanaian head computed tomography images available from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at KBTH Hospital. The orbital height and orbital width of each orbit were measured on a 3D CT skull. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 20.

Results

The study had more females than men (167, 47.71%, vs 183, 52.29%). The observed orbital index of Ghanaians in the study was 81.22 ± 4.22. The mean orbital index was 80.52 ± 4.66 in males and 82.15 ± 3.83 in females with their difference being statistically significant (p value <0.05). This placed both genders in the Microseme category of orbit. There was no significant difference between the orbital index of the two orbital sides (left and right orbits).

Conclusion

The study found Ghanaians in the category of the Microseme and also indicated a strong sexual dimorphism. The outcome of this study may be useful in forensic medicine for skull classification and also for better surgical approach in neurosurgery as well as cosmetic surgery.

Keywords

Orbital index Ghanaian Microseme Forensic CT

Background

The determination of origin and identity of the skeletal remains collected from a crime scene is an important and difficult task. Different craniofacial measurements and indices can be useful for this purpose. The mode of determining the parameters needed for the estimation of these indices depends on the type of samples used. However, dry bone collection with all the information available about the bones has been indicated to be the best source of sample to work on [1]. However, advanced radiological techniques have been proven to be the better choice in cases where skull collection is a problem [2].

Several craniofacial indices have been used in the determination of population origin and identity. An example is the orbital index (OI) which involves taking measurement between various landmarks on the orbit. The orbital cavities are located on the opposite sides of the midsagittal plane of the skull and fall at a point between the cranium and the facial bones [3]. These cavities are each intended to serve as a socket for the eye balls and also contain associated muscles, vessels, nerves, lacrimal apparatus, facial strata and soft pad [4]. Each bony orbit is composed of seven bones: maxilla, palatine, frontal, zygoma, sphenoid, ethmoid and lacrimal. These bones are arranged to enclose a roughly quadrilateral pyramidal cavity. Among modern human groups, the characteristics of the orbit vary considerably [5].

Among parameters estimated during the craniofacial morphometric examination is the OI, the proportion of the orbit height to its width multiplied by 100%. This is known to be determined by the shape of the face and varies with race, regions within the same race and periods in evolution [6]. The OI has been studied by many authors. Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7] evaluated the OI among the Igbo ethnic group of Nigeria. Igbigbi and Ebite [8] recorded the OI of the Malawian to be part of the Megaseme category. Also, Kaur et al. [3] reported Microseme type of OI in the Bathinda population of India. All these studies indicated some level of racial and ethnic variation in the OI of various population groups.

The knowledge of this index is therefore very applicable in various fields such as in interpretation of fossil records, skull classification in forensic medicine and in exploring the trends in evolutionary and ethnic differences. Furthermore, documented ranges of this index in different nationalistic groups will assist in skull identification [7], in particular, among difference races, where forensic data is not available. In addition, a prior knowledge of the orbital morphometry is very essential for better surgical approach and outcome. Countries like Japan, China, India, Malawi and many others have classified their population under one of the above predetermined categories (i.e. Megaseme, OI = 89 or over; Mesoseme, OI = 89–83; and Microseme, OI = 83 or less), based on their average OI. However, there is no study in literature pertaining to morphometry of orbit in Ghanaian population. Therefore, this study of orbital morphometry in the skulls of Ghanaians has developed a database to determine normal range of orbital values and OI in the Ghanaian population.

Method

A retrospective quantitative cross-sectional approach was adopted for the study. The study was conducted at the Computed Tomography Unit of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, where computed tomography (CT) data of patients are stored. This hospital is the biggest Hospital in Ghana which receives people (patients) from all parts of country. Systematic random sampling method was used to select 350 normal adult (18 years and above) head CT scans of Ghanaians, who had reported to the CT Unit for head CT scan from 1 January to 31 December 2015. Prior the sampling, CT scan images of subjects with craniofacial abnormality and prior craniofacial surgery were excluded. In addition, CT images from foreign nationals were not included in the study.

In the study, all volumetric head CT scan images which were obtained within the specified period of the study and sampled from the backup system of the CT unit were converted into 3D version. Measurements were done using the computer software of the Toshiba Aquillion ONE V4.82 ER001 640 slices CT equipment and a simple and brief data collection spread sheet was designed to record the data. The orbital width (OW) (the distance between the dacryon to orbital tubercle) and orbital height (OH) (the distance between superior and inferior margin at the midpoint and perpendicular to the OW), as depicted in Fig. 1, were recorded for each subject. In all, the data collected included age, gender, OH and OW.
Fig. 1

Showing orbital dimensions (OH and OW)

The formula \( \mathrm{O}\mathrm{I} = \frac{\mathrm{OH}}{\mathrm{OW}}\times 100\% \) was used to determine the OI.

Microsoft excel and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used to analyse the data. Microsoft excel was used to generate tables and graphs, respectively. Independent sample t test and paired t test were used to determine the statistical significance of all parameters of orbits, with respect to gender and side (right and left side) respectively. ANOVA was also used to determine the significance of the variation between the orbital indices of various age groups. The results were considered significant when p value <0.05 and were considered highly significant when p value <0.001. The results are reported as mean, standard deviation, mean difference and p value in the form of tables and graphs.

In accordance with the established protocols on research of the University of Ghana, ethical approval was sought from the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences of the University of Ghana for the commencement of this study. Permission was also sought from the Head of the Radiology Department of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital for access to the stored data. In addition, codes were assigned to the CT images and were also stored using a hard drive on the researcher’s laptop locked with a password which is known by only the researcher. These helped in ensuring patient’s anonymity and confidentiality.

Results

Three hundred and fifty (350) head CT scan images were used for the study which consisted of 167 female images (47.71%) and 183 male images (52.29%). The age range was 18–93 years. The range of observed orbital height was 30.8–41.2 mm which varies 30.8–41.2 mm in females and 31.3–40.3 mm in males. Also, the range of observed orbital width was 40.0–48.2 mm in females and 40.0–48.7 mm in males. The general range of OW was also observed to be 40.0–48.7 mm. By using OH and width, the OI was calculated. The range of observed OI was 71.86–93.7 in females and 70.02–93.99 in males. Thus, the general observed range of OI was 70.02–93.99 with a mean OI being 81.22 ± 4.22 for the study population. The comparisons between male and female indices, left and right orbital dimensions and the left and right orbital indices of the two gender groups are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In addition, the comparisons between OI of age groups with respect to the orbital sides of female, and OI of male age groupings with respect to the orbital sides, are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Figures 2 and 3 also present the comparison results of the orbital index of the various age groups of the female and male with respect to the orbital sides. Findings of this study in terms of orbital index of the orbital sides, and that of OI among the genders, were compared to other studies, and the findings are shown in Table 6 and 7, respectively.
Table 1

Comparison between male and female orbital indices

Parameters

Gender

Mean

SD

Mean difference

p value

Height (mm)

Female

35.14

1.69

0.13

0.35

Male

35.01

1.92

Width (mm)

Female

42.81

1.58

−0.72

0.00

Male

43.53

1.78

OI (%)

Female

82.15

3.83

1.63

0.00

Male

80.52

4.66

Table 2

Comparison between left and right orbital dimensions

Parameter

Side

Mean

S D

Mean difference

p value

Height (mm)

Left

35.08

1.83

0.01

0.71

Right

35.07

1.80

Width (mm)

Left

43.15

1.74

−0.06

0.018

Right

43.21

1.71

OI (%)

Left

81.37

4.48

0.15

0.221

Right

81.22

4.24

Table 3

Comparison between the left and right orbital indices of the two gender groups

Side

Gender

Mean (%)

S D

Mean difference

p value

RTOI

Female

82.06

3.86

1.60

0.00

Male

80.45

4.43

LTOI

Female

82.24

3.80

1.66

0.00

Male

80.58

4.90

Table 4

Comparison between OI of age groups with respect to the orbital sides of female

Side

Age (years)

Frequency

Mean (%)

SD

Minimum (%)

Maximum (%)

p value

Right

18–25

17

80.5202

2.55947

75.64

85.27

0.342

26–35

30

82.8447

2.77967

77.98

88.65

36–45

27

81.5057

4.11318

71.86

90.82

46–55

22

83.1148

5.48581

72.99

93.70

56–65

26

81.8915

3.32048

76.75

88.57

66–75

29

82.3514

4.05725

76.39

89.88

76 Above

16

81.4123

3.98478

76.70

89.25

Total

167

82.0559

3.86280

71.86

93.70

 

Left

18–25

17

80.1755

2.73002

74.94

85.65

0.159

26–35

30

83.1695

3.15333

78.03

89.05

36–45

27

81.8468

4.03823

74.66

91.02

46–55

22

83.3973

4.99640

75.00

93.20

56–65

26

82.0666

3.36512

76.52

88.00

66–75

29

82.2109

3.78118

75.45

89.44

76 above

16

82.0903

3.84414

77.53

89.93

Total

167

82.2393

3.79768

74.66

93.20

 
Table 5

Comparison between OI of male age groupings with respect to the orbital sides

Side

Age (years)

Frequency

Mean (%)

SD

Minimum (%)

Maximum (%)

p value

Right

18–25

19

78.9770

4.60167

71.12

88.66

0.679

26–35

37

80.3821

4.90736

70.44

93.72

36–45

25

80.6998

4.44213

73.23

88.97

46–55

27

79.9174

3.55092

71.86

87.62

56–65

38

80.7150

4.41730

72.05

91.08

66–75

15

80.9165

6.12256

72.16

93.99

76 above

22

81.4567

3.00702

75.12

87.81

Total

183

80.4532

4.42584

70.44

93.99

 

Left

18–25

19

78.9782

4.33440

70.02

88.69

0.709

26–35

37

81.1583

7.18298

70.59

112.94

36–45

25

80.6563

4.22157

74.38

89.50

46–55

27

80.0834

3.98571

71.96

88.83

56–65

38

80.4962

4.26004

72.05

90.67

66–75

15

80.6611

5.50559

71.24

89.05

76 above

22

81.6081

2.68264

76.12

84.80

Total

183

80.5806

4.90282

70.02

112.94

 
Fig. 2

OI of the various female age groups with respect to the orbital sides

Fig. 3

OI of the various male age groups with respect to the orbital sides

Table 6

Comparison of orbital index of the orbital sides to other studies

Author

Right

Left

p value

Mekala et al. [10]

85.22 ± 7.21

84. 2± 7.24

0.716

Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7]

72.20 ± 13.5

72.00 ± 13.1

0.88

Gopalakrishna and Kashinatha [12]

80.69 ± 2.19

81.16 ± 2.02

0.011

Present study

81.22 ± 4.24

81.37 ± 4.48

0.22

Table 7

Comparison of OI in present study with other studies among the genders

Author

Male

Female

P-value

Category

Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7]

73.6 ± 13.3

69.9 ± 13.5

0.014

Microseme

Ebeye and Otikpo [11]

78.15 ± 0.82

78.57 ± 0.6

<0.05

Microseme

Mekala et al. [10]

84.62 ± 8.21

85.46 ± 5.93

0.14

Mesoseme

Present study

80.52 ± 4.66

82.15 ± 3.83

0.00

Microseme

Discussion

The orbit is a craniofacial structure located on the anterior surface of the skull. Its morphology varies considerably between race and ethnic groups belonging to different geographical regions of the world. This study was aimed at determining the orbital dimensions and OI of Ghanaians who reported to the radiology unit of KBTH. The knowledge of these orbital dimensions and index is applicable in skull classification in forensic medicine and also very essential for better surgical approach and outcome. As such, various orbital measurement were taken on a 3D bone reconstructed images which, according to Cavalcanti et al. [9], is highly accurate and deemed a better choice when skeletal remains are not available for direct measurement.

The mean OI of the female and male were found to be 82.15 ± 3.83 and 80.52 ± 4.66, respectively. These values placed both genders in the Microseme category of orbit. This confirms a previous study which demonstrated that the black races have Microseme OI [10].

Comparison between the mean OI of the two genders also showed a significantly higher OI in females than in the males. This is in agreement with Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7] and Ebeye and Otikpo [11] who documented similar finding between the two genders. However, unlike Ebeye and Otikpo [11], Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7] found the male OI to be significantly higher in males than that of the females. With regards to the difference between the OI of the genders, the result of this current study was in contrast with the findings of Mekala et al. [10].

Moreover, comparison between the dimensions of left and right orbits shows that the difference between the mean OH and OW of both orbital sides was statistically not significant, indicating that the orbit with respect to sides have similar dimensions.

When the mean OI of both sides (right and left) were compared, the difference was also statistically not significant. This is in line with the findings of Mekala et al. [11] and Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7]. However, the findings of this study contradict that of Gopalakrishna and Kashinatha [12].

Notwithstanding, a statistically significant value was observed when both right and left OI were compared with respect to the gender groups, to indicate that the male and female groups differ in OI. However, the various age groups (combination of men and female) indicated almost the same OI as there were no significant results. This particular outcome is in contrast with the findings of both Igbigbi and Ebite [8] and Ezeuko and Om’Iniabohs [7].

Meanwhile, this study suggests a variation between the OI of the same age group when the two gender groups are compared. This is in line with the findings of Igbigbi and Ebite [8] which indicated that within the same age group, female orbital indices were higher than males. This implies that among patients who reported at the CT unit for head CT, the female have higher OI irrespective of their age group.

Finally, ethnic differences with respect to the orbital indices would have been an area of interest to explore; however, as a limitation of the study, this was not included because there was no data on the patients’ ethnic groupings in the storage system of the CT unit.

Conclusion

The orbital index of Ghanaians as seen in this study is 81.22 ± 4.22. This places the Ghanaians who reported at the CT Unit of KBTH for head CT in the Microseme category of orbit irrespective of their age or gender. This study also showed sexual dimorphism among the study population as the male and female OI were found to be significantly different. In addition, the study for the first time provides baseline information and an anthropomorphic data on the orbit of the Ghanaian population. Thus, the result of this study may be useful in forensic science for skull identification of unknown victims at crime scenes. It may also be useful during planning in surgery. This is very essential for better surgical approach and outcome.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

KBTH: 

Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital

OH: 

Orbital height

OI: 

Orbital index

OW: 

Orbital width

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the departmental staff for their support.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Author BOB, DSS and AMI designed the study. AMI performed the statistical analysis. BOB and AMI wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BOB, DSS and AMI revised it for important intellectual content and finally approved the version published. All authors read and approved the final version of the work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was sought from the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences of the University of Ghana for the commencement of this study, and it was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the College of Health Sciences of University of Ghana.

Consent for publication

Data was not retrieved directly from the patients; therefore, consent for publication was granted by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee that granted the study’s ethical approval.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiography, School of Biomedical and Allied health Sciences, University of Ghana

References

  1. Mehta M, Saini V, Nath S, Manharlal NP. CT scan images to determine the origin from craniofacial indices for Gujarat Population. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014;2:64–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Iscan M. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147:107–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kaur J, Ydav S, Singh Z. Orbital dimensions—a direct measurement study using dry skulls. J Academia Industrial Res. 2012;1:293–5.Google Scholar
  4. Patnaik V, Bala S, Singla K. Anatomy of bony orbit—some applied aspects. J Anat Soc India. 2001;50(1):59–67.Google Scholar
  5. Xing S, Victoria G, Ronald C, Liu W. Geometric morphometric analysis of orbit shape in Asian, African and European human population. Anthropological Sci. 2013;121(1):81–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Narasinge, B., & Pramila, M..A study of orbital index in dry skulls of North Coastal Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of basic and Applied Medical Sciences, 2015; 5(2): 1–3Google Scholar
  7. Ezeuko V, Om'Iniabohs F. Radiologic evaluation of orbital index among the Igbo Ethnic Group. Eur J Anatomy. 2015;19(1):9–14.Google Scholar
  8. Igbigbi P, Ebite L. Orbital index of adult Malawian. J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2010;11(1). http://www.anilaggrawal.com/ij/vol_011_no_001/papers/paper001.html.
  9. Cavalcanti M, Rocha S, Vannier M. Craniofacial measurement based on 3D-CT volume rendering implication for clinical application. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2004;33:170–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Mekala D, Shubha R, Rohini M. Orbiatal dimensions and orbital index: a measurement study on South Indian Dry Skull. Int J Anatomy Res. 2015;3(3):1387–91.Google Scholar
  11. Ebeye A, Otikpo O. Orbital index in Urhobos of Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013;8(2):51–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gopalakrishna K, Kashinatha M. The Craniometrical study orbital base of Indian Population and its applied importance. Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences. 2015;3(2):618–23.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement