Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Correction
  • Open Access

Correction to: Eye movements and brain oscillations to symbolic safety signs with different comprehensibility

Journal of Physiological Anthropology201837:30

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-018-0191-9

  • Received: 12 December 2018
  • Accepted: 12 December 2018
  • Published:

The original article was published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology 2015 34:42

Correction to: Journal of Physiological Anthropology (2015) 34:42

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-015-0081-3

After the publication of the original article [1] it was highlighted that there was an omission regarding the online resources for the traffic signs in the section of “Experimental stimuli”. The single online source listed in the Fig. 2 should be removed and the exact detailed two online sources for the traffic signs should be cited in the section “Experimental stimuli”. This correction article shows the correct and incorrect version of this section and the caption of Fig. 2. The authors apologize for the inconvenience.

Incorrect

Experimental stimuli

Ten symbolic traffic signs (Fig. 2) were used as stimuli in this study. Among those signs, five widely used road signs (S1—do not turn right; S4—do not turn left; S7—U-turn is prohibited; S9—do not go straight; S10—turn right) were hypothesized to be easy to comprehend, and the other five new road signs in UK (S2—no vehicle carrying explosives; S3—headphone users may be lost in music; S5—tourist area; S6—caution texter; S8—risk of grounding) were hypothesized to be hard to comprehend.

Fig. 2 Ten symbolic traffic signs and their intended meanings (source: Know your traffic signs, Department of Transport, UK. www.gov.uk/)

Correct

Experimental stimuli

Ten symbolic traffic signs (Fig. 2) were used as stimuli in this study. Among those signs, five widely used road signs (S1—do not turn right; S4—do not turn left; S7—U-turn is prohibited; S9—do not go straight; S10—turn right) were hypothesized to be easy to comprehend, while the other five new road signs (S2—no vehicle carrying explosives; S3—headphone users may be lost in music; S5—tourist area; S6—caution texter; S8—risk of grounding) were hypothesized to be hard to comprehend. Among five new road signs, signs 2, 8 were retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/ (The Highway Code: traffic signs, Department of Transport, UK) and signs 3, 5, 6 were retrieved from http://cabtradenews.org/2013/11/19/cab-drivers-call-for-new-road-signs-on-uk-roads/.

Fig. 2 Ten symbolic traffic signs and their intended meanings1

Notes

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Human and Systems Engineering, School of Design and Human Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, 689-798, South Korea
(2)
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, 34141, South Korea

Reference

  1. Siswandari, Xiong. Eye movements and brain oscillations to symbolic safety signs with different comprehensibility. J Physiol Anthropol. 2015;34:42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement